Tuesday, May 29, 2007

It seems the common folk have the right idea

Montreal PQ - In a letter to the editor in the Montreal Gazette, Dolly Tiger of Montreal states rather well that rather than spending billions of dollars on a new transit plan for Montreal, they should spend that money to fix what they have in place already.

It's a sentiment I have long held when dealing with anything political, especially public transit. Politicians and activist groups are hot to trot to spend money to roll out new and expensive toys while ignoring the infrastructure already in place. This is perhaps one of the main reasons public transit is falling apart today.

Just imagine how popular public transit could become if the transit agencies and politicians would invest in fixing what is already in place rather than building more things that puts further strain on an already strained system. The Port Authority of Allegheny County in Pittsburgh did just that in the early 1970's with very successful results. Over time it failed as they fell into the trap of ignoring what was in place and began focusing on expensive new toys and wasteful spending habits.

Having politicians and transit system administrations actually embrace fixing what is already in place most likely won't happen very often in our times. They can't get the face time in front of the media for ensuring proper funding is there to fix and improve the existing infrastructure. Because of the political treatment of transit, which is geared for new things rather than maintaining what's in place, it's easy to get government money for new transit projects but rather difficult to get money to actually run and maintain what is in place already.

While there are some flaws in Dolly Tiger's idea such as 20 minute service on every route, she is headed in the right direction. Fix what you have first before adding more. I often see letters like Dolly's and it makes me question why those in charge are so dense when the general public gets it.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

"I often see letters like Dolly's and it makes me question why those in charge are so dense when the general public gets it."

Maybe it's because many of those in charge don't ride the buses, yet they're the ones who get to decide how to serve, or maybe disserve, those who do.

RDC said...

Maybe it's because many of those in charge don't ride the buses, yet they're the ones who get to decide how to serve, or maybe disserve, those who do.

It really doesn't take much to understand the point of not adding more when you can't maintain what you already have. I've talked to many people on this subject over the years that have never ridden a any form of public transit in decades and they easily get the point.

The ones running the show however don't get it. Even the few that do understand within the industry bow to the political pressure of elected politicians who are among some of the least knowledgeable people I've ever met. I've yet to meet face to face an elected official that wasn't totally clueless on most every issue brought up.